Adverbs or Thall 's a-bhos

Fascinating topic ... although linguists will tell you that Gaelic is actually quite boring in terms of its adverbial system. For example, Caucasian languages make a distinction of whether the object in question is higher, lower, or on the same level as you and whether it's visible or hidden from view. But I digress.

To start with, Gaelic distinguishes three spatial locations: proximal, medial and distal. Which in human means something that's close to the speaker, something that's close to the addressee, and something that's remote from either. Luckily, Doraemon has agreed to help us out with an example:

Why the arrows? Because an-seo [əˈʃɔ], an-sin [əˈʃin], and an-siud [əˈʃid] are quite 'specific' in their reference. When you use them, you're making a clear statement about where something is. These three vary quite a bit in their pronunciation, so here's an overview:

an-seo	an-sin	an-siud
[əNʲˈʃɔ]	[əNʲˈʃin]	[əNʲˈʃid]
[əˈʃɔ]	[əˈʃin]	[əˈʃid]
[ənəˈʃɔ]	[ənəˈʃin]	[ənəˈʃid]
[ənəˈhjɔ]	[ənəˈhin]	[ənəˈhid]

What's the difference? The first line is definitely careful speech, the second normal/colloquial, and the third and fourth just colloquial variants.

The above remark about being specific is important because Gaelic has another set of adverbs which are the exact opposite, thall [hauL] and a-bhos [əˈvos]:

Slightly exaggerated but that's essentially the difference - thall is the space some way away from the speaker but with no specification of how far or where in location to the person addressed. A-bhos is similarly vague, so they often get translated "by over here, hereabouts" and "over there, thereabouts".

You can combine them to emphasise the "over here" or "over there" bit: a-bhos an-seo, thall an-siud, thall an-sin.

The fun part starts when you realise that Gaelic distinguishes between location and motion and has corresponding adverbs:

Shuas [huəs] and shìos [hiəs] are simply adverbs of location - nobody is moving.

This is the fun bit - you have to watch out whether a movement is towards the speaker or away from him. If your cat is running up the stairs in front of you, she is going suas, if you are standing on top of the stairs and your owner is zooming up the stairs towards you, he is coming a-nìos [əˈniəs].

And the other way round - if your owner is running away from you down the stairs, he is going sìos [ʃiəs], if Tiddles is falling down the stairs towards you, she is coming a-nuas [əˈnuəs]. Confusingly, some dialects have merged a-nuas and a-nìos into a-nuas, in which case a-nuas stands for 'movement towards you either up or downwards'.

It may help you to think of them as *an-shìos and *an-shuas, from below and from above, which is where these words originally come from which is also the reason why the n at the beginning of a-nuas and a-nìos are weak as if they were word medial or final - because they originally were stuck at the end of an-.

But let's move on. We still have to deal with movement in the thall and a-bhos arena:

Pronounced a-nall [əˈnãũL] and a-null [əˈnũːL]. Assuming that, as explained above, a-bhos and thall are considered "fuzzy" concepts. A-nunn [əˈnũːN], which you will sometimes see is just a variant of a-null.

That's it.

Err ... not quite, as we've had a question about a-bhàn "down" (motion) and an-àird "up" (motion). This used to be a question of Mainland dialects (which used a-bhàn and an-àird) and Island Dialects (which use the above system). Today it's a stylistic question - a-bhàn and an-àird definitely being the marked terms. Which means that they are less common and sound something between off and posh when you use them, although an-àird is more acceptable than a-bhàn.